A route for making ethylene glycol without starting from ethylene is under development. Shell Chemical is a leading provider of ethylene glycol (EG) process technology. The conventional process for making EG is hydrolysis of ethylene oxide (EO), which is made by oxidizing ethylene over a silver catalyst.
For many years, the selectivity of the ethylene oxidation has been no better than ~85%; however, lately Shell has developed catalysts that are capable of achieving 90% selectivity. EO hydrolysis is typically carried out noncatalytically in a large excess of water. The selectivity to EG is only ~90%; diethylene glycol, and triethylene glycol are the byproducts. As one remedy, Shell now offers a two-step process for converting EO to EG via an ethylene carbonate intermediate that produces EG in almost 100% selectivity.
A. Lenero and colleagues at Shell are working on a different route to EG—one that does not begin with ethylene. Their method proceeds by hydroformylating formaldehyde to give glycolaldehyde, which can undergo hydrogenolysis to make EG. The first step is the difficult part, and the key to this invention is an improved catalyst for the hydroformylation step.
In one example, 0.15 mol of formaldehyde (in the form of 37% aqueous formalin), 37 mL (0.22 mol) of N,N-dibutylacetamide, 7.5 mL of water, 0.49 mmol of Rh(acac)(CO)2, 0.96 mmol of 2-phospha-2-(ethyl-N,N-dimethylamido)-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-6,9,10-trioxa-tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane, and 9.1 mmol of trimethylbenzoic acid are added to an autoclave. After the air is flushed out, the autoclave is pressurized to 3 MPa with CO and heated to 90 °C for 5 h. The conversion of formaldehyde is 90%, and the yield of glycolaldehyde is calculated to be 90%. In a separate example, glycolaldehyde is easily converted to EG by hydrogenolysis at 40 °C over Raney nickel. (Shell Oil [Houston]. US Patent 7,511,178
Source: CAS Patent Watch
Continue to read this post...
Collapse this post back.
Cornell plant scientists have invented a new method that uses manure and other farm byproducts to remove toxic hydrogen sulfide from biogas -- a renewable energy source derived from the breakdown of animal waste.
Hydrogen sulfide can combine with water to cause acid rain and to corrode engines. Its removal makes biogas a more viable alternative fuel source. The new method will be marketed under the name SulfaMaster.
"SulfaMaster has a very large potential application for distributed bioenergy production at small sites around the country," said Gary Harman, professor of plant biology at the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station in Geneva.
Harman and Terry Spittler, a retired analytical chemist at Cornell, own Terrenew, a small company at Cornell Agriculture and Food Technology Park in Geneva that will market the product. In addition, Terrenew markets two other products that also use agricultural waste to help clean up environmental contaminants, including oil spills and heavy metals, from water.
With more than 9 million dairy cows in the United States, each producing on average more than 120 pounds of manure daily, biogas is already a key energy source for many sustainable farms. It's created by anaerobic digestion -- a process by which microorganisms break down manure and other organic matter in the absence of oxygen. The resulting biogas contains high levels of methane and carbon dioxide, but also a small amount of hydrogen sulfide.
Most methods for hydrogen sulfide removal require expensive industrial scrubbers that are not feasible for smaller farms.
"In most cases, these methods are meant for oil refineries and are not suited to small-scale use," Harman said.
On the other hand, Terrenew's process uses manure as a major component of a special medium, which is placed in barrels. "The gas is then piped into the bottom of barrels, [and as it] passes through the medium, the hydrogen sulfide is removed," Harman explained. "The resulting clean methane (plus carbon dioxide) can then be used for energy."
Harman estimates that the SulfaMaster medium can be reused up to six times before it needs to be replenished in the biogas mixture.
The new product also has promise off the farm. Biogas is prevalent in sewage treatment plants and landfills, especially those that accept construction and demolition waste. These sites can capture cleaner biogas and use it to power their operations.
Terrenew, using partial funding from the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, demonstrated the product last summer at El-Vi Farms in Phelps, N.Y., and found promising results. The company plans to run another test to remove hydrogen sulfide from a landfill before releasing SulfaMaster. Last month, the Cornell Center for Technology Enterprise and Commercialization filed a patent on the technology that will be licensed to Terrenew
However, I have a better option to remove Sulfur from biogas.
Source: Cornell University
Continue to read this post...
Collapse this post back.
Propylene oxide (PO) production technology is undergoing something of a renaissance. After 1974, when the first propylene oxide–styrene monomer technology plant came on stream, no new PO technology was put into use until 2003, when Sumitomo Chemical started up its new coproduct-free route to PO that was based on cumene hydroperoxide as the propylene epoxidizing agent.
This innovation spurred others to develop alternative ways to make PO, such as direct-oxidation and H2O2-based routes. Another method is the so-called hydro-oxidation route, in which propylene is exposed to a mixture of oxygen and hydrogen. This route has been plagued by low productivity because of very low conversions per pass.
H. Abekawa, T. Kawabata, and M. Yako disclose a technique in which the productivity of propylene hydro-oxidation is increased and selectivity to PO is maintained at relatively high levels. The key to the inventors’ method is adding polycyclic compounds such as anthracene, naphthalene, tetracene, and pyrene to the reaction solvent in the presence of titanium silicalite and supported palladium catalysts. For example, a propylene oxide reaction was carried out in an autoclave at 60 °C and 0.8 MPa pressure by feeding a 4:4:10:82 propylene–oxygen–hydrogen–nitrogen gas mixture at 20 L/h and a H2O–MeCN 20:80 w/w solution containing 0.7 mmol/kg of anthracene and 0.7 mmol/kg of NaH2PO4 at 108 mL/h. Ti-silicalite (0.133 g) and Pd/C (0.33 g) activated carbon were added to the reaction mixture. PO was made in 87% selectivity based on the amount of propylene consumed; almost all of the remaining propylene was converted to propane. Productivity, defined as the amount of PO made per unit weight of titanium catalyst, was 33.5
Source: CAS Patent Watch
Continue to read this post...
Collapse this post back.